Le sam. 21 mai 2016 à 5:53, Andrey Korobkov <[email protected]> a
écrit :
I also wanted to ask someone to make Parabola docker container: as a
Free Software developer,
I already use only free development tools, and would be glad to have
a fully free testing environment for my programs.
Now I'm using Trisquel semi-official docker image
(https://hub.docker.com/r/kpengboy/trisquel/).
Semi-official because the Trisquel project still didn't give it an
official status (would be nice to have).
May be Parabola team could make their image fully offical?
On Sat, 21 May 2016 05:48:15 +0200
aurelien <[email protected]> wrote:
It is free in price to create one repository, I do not know if it is
free as in freedom (at this time), but if it is we could have a
parabola
image over there :-)
Docker Hub perpetuates the usual freedom issue of software
repositories: it distributes non-libre software. That probably
explains why Trisquel doesn't endorse the particular docker
container on that site.
The libreplanet-discuss mailing list has touched the possibility
of creating a liberated docker repository,[1] in the same spirit
of libre distros like Parabola, and as part of what would be a
wider effort to provide FSDG-compliant repositories for
programming language package managers.[2]
I don't use Docker. I'm personally satisfied with our ISO images,
but of course I don't object to the mere creation of a Parabola
container for Docker. I just don't think Parabola should endorse
the Docker repository.
[1]:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libreplanet-discuss/2016-04/threads.html#00103
[2]:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libreplanet-discuss/2016-04/threads.html#00018
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
