On 06/13/2016 06:40 PM, coadde wrote: > On 06/13/2016 05:33 PM, Richard Stallman wrote: >> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] >> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] >> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] >> >> The invariant sections in manuals under the GFDL are not part >> of the documentation. They are works of opinion. That's what >> makes them ethically legitimate, in our view. The documenation is >> free, but has to be accompanied with the statement of political >> views that support the free software movement. >> >> It is self-defeating for an activity of the free software movement >> to adopt rules against making sure its views reach the public. > > I think you mean about it: > > "with the exceptions of: non-modifiable license texts, works under the > GNU Free Documentation License with invariant sections, and works of > opinion." > > Maybe the below example could solve it, eg: > > with the exceptions of: works of opinion licenses like CC by-ND.[0][1] > > [0]:http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#FreeDocumentationLicenses > [1]:http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OpinionLicenses
There are some references about free culture licenses that could be useful for us: http://freedomdefined.org/Licenses http://freeculture.org/about/license
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
