On 08/01/2016 07:04 PM, fauno wrote: > André Silva <[email protected]> writes: > >> [ Unknown signature status ] >> On 08/01/2016 07:23 PM, André Silva wrote: >>>>> * Testing against all type of attacks to check our security settings is >>>>> ok. >>>> +1. We should have someone audit the server for any vulnerabilities. >>> +1, i suggest use linux-libre-audit for it. >> In this case, since it is a server, i could create a modified version of >> linux-libre-lts with AUDIT support called linux-libre-lts-audit, what do >> you think guys? > what about grsec? > grsec would probably be better for the server, but what does the audit kernel do? I meant literally audit it, as in run nmap and other tools to scan for vulnerabilities...
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
