Joshua Haase <[email protected]> writes: >> Nonprism packages replace other packages in the same way that libre >> packages do. So I think 'nonprism' repo should also be activated by >> default. > > If there is a way to use nonprism by default and install the other > version if needed, i'd vote for it to be activated by default. > > But this repo active by default and stopping you to use the other > version is too invasive.
IMO privacy related changes to packages that don't break things should be applied to any package, so +1 to backport them to [libre] and [pcr]! (for instance, many arch packages contain o=rX permissions for files where they aren't needed... wasn't there an arch-security comitee?) -- :>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
