On 10/26/2016 03:43 PM, Alejandro Hernández wrote: > I have to say that as an user I had no idea about the existence of a > 'nonprism' repo. So I think the repo should be available by default to > the users. Just the same way 'pcr' should be. 👈 > > 'nonprism' repo is the result of the developers' job and it is a great > feature for the defense of the user rights. 👈 > > ... > > Sorry if I'm out of date. > Thanks. > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
Thank you for your comments, you're slightly out of date but just in time for a new consensus. :) I will be making a new letter to the mailing list concerning the depth of nonprism and a meta package suggestion. Luke
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
