On 01/24/2017 10:06 PM, fauno wrote: > Luke <[email protected]> writes: > >> Hello, > nice guys over at qtengine, uh? :) > > i'm not clear if the question of unclear or missing licenses in source > files is already answered or not... > I believe that is only an upstream issue, per Isaac who actually went through the report and found false positives: https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/2017-January/004697.html
However, that doesn't exclude the fact were are shipping proprietary codecs right now: https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/qt5-webengine#n44
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
