Hello,

I've noticed that there has been much secrecy about the exact mainboard
model of the build server G4JC (Luke R.) and Emulatorman (André Silva)
have proposed.

From the private communication G4JC and Emulatorman have initiated with
fauno and me:

On 29.03.2017 04:32, Luke wrote:
> I'm shipping Libreboot compatible Mobo/RAM/CPU + heatsinks + paste /
> HDD + SATA cable.

On 29.03.2017 18:15, Tiberiu wrote:
> On 29.03.2017 18:01, André Silva wrote:
>> > It is a x86_64 machine
> I'm very curios what board it is. Is it ASUS KFSN4-DRE? Or ASUS
> KCMA-D8? D510MO? D945GCLF? :-) I'm reading from the libreboot hardware
> compatibility list: https://libreboot.org/docs/hcl/

Also, I didn't see on the mailing list any consensus on the budget for
this build server. I believe this goes against the Parabola Social
Contract.

"4. [...] the community is to be included whenever there is a need to
make a decision"

https://wiki.parabola.nu/Parabola_Social_Contract

Knowing this, the Parabola delegate fauno (Nicolás Reynolds) has
personally expressed concerns about the expenses related to this
proposal especially on the shipping of the chassis/UPS. The dismissal of
fauno's concerns as "unnecessary drama" by G4JC goes against the Fiscal
Sponsorship Agreement.

2. a) **Nicolás Reynolds is Parabola's Delegate** (the "Delegate") to
   communicate any and all donation-related (including but not limited
   to expenditure) decisions to Ceata's Council.  Ceata will only object
   to the decisions to the extent Parabola is not in compliance with §
   2(b) or § 5 of this Agreement, or when the Delegate's communication
   isn't in conjuction with a Parabola document or resource at
   parabola.nu website.

https://git.parabola.nu/~~historic/ceata-agreement.git/tree/Parabola+Ceata_Agreement.markdown

I've tried to be proactive and have come with solutions:

On 28.03.2017 19:58, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic wrote:
> Please excuse me if I'm overstepping here, but what would you say
> about a librebooted KGPe-D16 build server for Parabola hosted in
> Bucharest, Romania?
[...]
> If you believe this could be an option worth considering, I could
> present you a budget (that I believe would cost you less than 400
> USD).

On 29.03.2017 18:24, Tiberiu wrote:
> Maybe we can try to find if someone is traveling from USA to Brazil?
> They could transport the UPS/chassis in their checked-in baggage,
> right?

Later, I learned on the mailing list that the proposed board is a
KFSN4-DRE. This mainboard supports DDR2 RAM and not DDR3 and is in many
aspects inferior to the KGPE-D16 that FSF, Guix and other free software
projects use and I proposed for the same amount of money.

On 07.04.2017 01:47, Luke wrote:
> * KFSN4-DRE - Motherboard (Libreboot compatible, but not re-flashed
> yet, would feel more comfortable for it to be done on delivery anyway)

So, my question is: has the Parabola community been presented and have
you discussed options and the detailed budget for the new build server?
Have you reached a consensus about this for fauno to tell me what needs
to paid for?

Have you discussed location of the new build server? This is relevant
for the shipping/collocation.

I'm looking forward to hearing what you all have to say on this matter.

Tiberiu
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to