On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 21:08:25 -0400, Luke Shumaker wrote: > I'm working on having libremakepkg produce sourceballs. I was > wondering if anyone had strong opinions about regular-sourceballs > (`--source`) vs all-sourceballs (`--allsource`). Perhaps having both > with different extensions (what extension would be used other than > `.src.tar.xz`?). > > Also, if anyone has opinions about sourceballs appearing anywhere > other than $SRCPOOL (https://repo.parabola.nu/sources/parabola). I'm > somewhat attracted to the idea of them appearing along side the > package files (`.pkg.tar.xz`) in the repo directories.
I forgot about `.abs.tar.gz` files. .abs.tar.gz files (which in Arch are produced by `abs.git:scripts/update-abs.sh`) will live alongside the `.db.tar.gz` files, and contain the regular source; while the `.src.tar.xz` files will contain the allsource. I may end up having .src.tar.xz files appear alongside the .pkg.tar.xz files. We'll see. -- Happy hacking, ~ Luke Shumaker _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
