+1 I think we could have a mechanism on [pcr] that packages that have not been rebuild in X amount of time are marked as candidates for removal.
On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 07:15:20PM -0400, Megver83 wrote: > Hi, I'll go direct to the point. The [pcr] repository has many packages > that haven't been upgraded for ages, however, they are not marked as > outdated. Some of those unused packages are not even compiled (they are > only in the abslibre), I found a few when I began to adopt some packages > which even had MIPS in the "arch" array of their PKGBUILDs. If those are > ancient packages that have not been marked as outdated, it's likely > because no one installs them anymore, so I think that for that reason we > should remove those until someone requests it. > > In the free time that I don't have I will hunt some :D > -- > GPG: 0x227CA7C556B2BA78 > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ my GPG Public Key: https://files.grapentin.org/.gpg/public.key ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
