you would know best how problematic is may be to keep all these "foo-openrc" alternatives around - the one thing i would add is that the other "your-whatever" meta packages off replacements for the essential things that they remove - in the case of your-initfreedom that would currently need to be everything that is now a *-openrc packages - but would that not make it problematic to add other inits or replace openrc entirely? - "anti-systemd" is not the same as "init freedom" - for freedom you need to be able to move freely - this sounds like locking in either systemd or openrc with no room for anything else
i like the idea of trying shepherd for example - but how would that fit into this scheme? - if all non-systemd inits were lumped together then there still need to be a slew of *-openrc and *-shepherd packages analogous to their *-system counterparts - so maybe not much is gained by this practically speaking
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
