El 14/05/18 a las 09:32, bill-auger escribió: > On Mon, 2018-05-14 at 07:55 -0300, Freemor wrote: >> I'd like to propose an "unar is replaced by unarchiver" >
How can we achieve that? we can't build an external package to do such
things like a manjaro-system thing, we just have to post a new in the
feed saying this
> yes these are both obvious solutions - i really posted this to see if anyone
> could explain the confused situation it is currently in
>
> * why the 'unar' package is not already named 'unarchiver'
I also wondered that
> * why the 'unar' package replaces('unrar') but that is an entirely different
> software
maybe someone confused "alternative" with "replacement"
> * why the 'unar' package is in [libre] and not [pcr] although it is not
> modified
> from the upstream
>
wasn't it at [pcr] at first?
> if no one knows how it got that way, can we at least agree that all 3 of those
> points are incorrect procedure
>
yes, that's right. Unless (regarding point 1) the package unarchiver was
added after adding unar in Parabola, which would explain the conflicts
array. No matter unar's history, I think we should remove it and write
about this in the news so that users know what happened.
--
~Megver83
SIP: [email protected]
XMPP: [email protected]
Tox: [email protected]
GPG: 0x227CA7C556B2BA78
GNUSocial: @[email protected]
Diaspora*: [email protected]
Matrix: @Megver83:matrix.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
