The point of having a privacy-as-default repository with less maintenance workload is absolutely right for me.
What is the current status on this? Is there any help needed? I could investigate, test or build packages. Otherwise I can also look at today's [nonprism] packages and keep them up-to-date. bill-auger <[email protected]> schrieb am Sun, 15. Dec 19 21:50:
i like the idea of the name change - it is probably was never meaningful to most people unless they read the wiki article first - a concise name like 'privacy' would make its purpose much more obvious AFAIK the repo name itself could be changed arbitrarily; but each of the packages also have ".nonprismN" in the 'pkgrel' - im not sure why that is necessary (likewise for ".nonsystemdN") - packages in [libre] and [pcr] do not end with ".libreN" or ".pcrN" in my experience, `pacman -Syu` will not automatically upgrade a newer version of some duplicated package if it is in a lower-priority repo - it is absolutely necessary to have the repos declared in pacman.conf in the expected order of priority - so, it should be totally sane to drop the special descriptors ".nonprismN" and ".nonsystemdN" from the 'pkgver', and have the same ".parabolaN", or ".parN" for all packages, right? maybe im confused about that; but it is common when packaging with libretools, that some package conflicts arise because some package needs to be deleted from the local /repo, which is shadowing the one in the public repos, because of its priority in the chroot pacman.conf _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
