afaik, Gajim only offers FLOSS plugins El 26-07-20 a las 15:44, bill-auger escribió: > that is one of the main reasons why plugins are packaged > separately though - if that program allows searching and > downloading plugins from the internet, it falls under the > category of a third-party package manager, and most of > those are dubious WRT FSDG-fitness > > unless that program only lists free software, then it is likely > that someone will eventually post a freedom bug report, to > remove the entire download feature - which means we may need to > re-package gajim, and some of its its popular plugins too > > there is a long discussion about TPPMs, and many related issues, > and proposals for how to handle them - it seems that gajim needs > to be added to that ticket as another one to investigate > > https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/1035 > > we should be moving in the direction of filtering or avoiding > third-party package managers, rather than encouraging people to > use them - what we have found so far, is that filtering is either > very difficult or impossible to do automatically, because very > few TPPMs indicate licenses or have any policies about what is > allowed in the repo - with the exception of haskell and guix, > which have stricter guidelines than the others, it would be > better to discourage their use as much as possible > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
