On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 17:08:52 -0500 bill-auger <[email protected]> wrote:
> the difficulty is in how to determine which repos are FSDG > compliant repositories, when none of them have that as a goal - > the haskell repo strive to be OSI-compliant - that is perhaps > close enough - but i expect a very short list in the end: > > * debian > * guix > * haskell > * hyperbola > * pureos > * trisquel > > that could be the complete list already That simplifies things a lot. Thanks a lot. Personally I often end up having to use multiple FSDG compliant distributions for a reason or another[1] while contributing to free software projects, so I also want to enable other people to relatively easily use all these distributions if they already use one FSDG compliant distribution. References: ----------- [1]Like deploying infrastructure (Trisquel), building Replicant (Specific Trisquel versions), building projects in containers for making it easier for contributors (guix), running automatic tests (guix), working with Replicant images (Parabola), etc. Denis.
pgpLqb3Z1Fgpj.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
