On Sun, 09 Jul 2023 12:08:30 +0300 Wael wrote:
> Hence, the upstream doesn't have proper releases as such and tagging cannot be
> done.
tagging is always possible - it takes only seconds - i would ask the upstream
to do it, and i would probably reject their software if they refused
per that description, this is, and always will be, an un-versioned VCS-only
source, which is against parabola policy, except for extraordinary
circumstances (a temporary mix-up, an emergency patch release, or otherwise a
super critical software - at the very least, it should be named
'prosody-modules-hg'
On Sun, 09 Jul 2023 12:08:30 +0300 Wael wrote:
> This is why I've resolved to versioning it according to the current prosody
> version that is available in the repos
though that seems sensible, it is mis-information; and does not have the desired
effect as you expect - the compatibility problem can be accomplished by pinning
it to a specific version of prosody
- depends=('prosody')
+ depends=('prosody=0.12.3')
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
