On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Luke T.Shumaker <[email protected]>wrote:
> At Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:50:06 -0500, > Daniel Clark wrote: > > 2012/1/16 Jorge Araya Navarro <[email protected]> > > > > have an ARM port, make it an optimal distro for a freedom-respecting > > > > device > > > > > > I'm going to take care of that part in few months!!! > > > > > > But in general, this problem is just bullshit, this make me sick and > sad > > > :-/. > > > > Not that this shouldn't be done, but out of general interest are their > any > > 100% freedom respecting ARM devices at the moment? Last I looked into > this > > (which was two years ago), they all required binary blobs for their 3D > > graphics, and the 3rd party company that controlled that seemed unlikely > to > > release either specs or code under a copyleft license. > > The GeeksPhone One (ARMv6) (and I presume the GeeksPhone Zero)[1] is > freedom respecting. > > Rhombus-Tech[2] is creating a Raspberry Pi-like product that will be > 100% freedom respecting. Even the hardware designs are free.[3] > > I am not sure about the OpenMoko Freerunner. > > Since it was brought up in a similar discussion on IRC, I'll go ahead > and rule out the Pandora[4] as it requires non-free firmwares.[5] > The BeagleBoard and derivatives based on that SoC have the same problem as Pandora.
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.parabolagnulinux.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
