aloniv added the comment: In the Apache license the term "no-charge" appears as well in regards to granting users the right to redistribute and modify the software and use the patents without needing to pay money to the developers of the software (see http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0). In the TrueCrypt license the wording isn't quite as clear. The Truecrypt license seems also problematic from other aspects, since it uses the confusing "intellectual property" phrase, discusses use of different names for the software in the modification section instead of in the trademarks section (where it belongs) and claims to be free software and open source (despite not being recognised as either) in the trademarks section.
____________________________________________________ Parabola's issue tracker <[email protected]> <https://bugs.parabolagnulinux.org/bugs/issue352> ____________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.parabolagnulinux.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
