> In fact http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8c/Gldt.svg > write us as Parabola
They call other distros "Debian" and "Ubuntu" despite these not being their full names. (I don't see any significance of this graph, it's based on wrong assumptions and is a tertiary source.) > And the fact is that Parabola only mean that this distribution is the > fully free side of ArchLinux. How is this related to naming? > So Parabola only sounds good, now, in the boot and the website it should > be fine to say somewhere Parabola a GNU / Linux-libre distro. We already discussed having "Parabola" as the generic name for the project and "Parabola GNU/Linux-libre" for the operating system using Linux-libre as the kernel. See the thread starting with https://lists.parabolagnulinux.org/pipermail/dev/2012-January/000313.html for details. > Now we have to think of the trouble to migrate all to another domaine > name, we will loose all the links writed on other website. So if we make > a complet migration of the website ... we have to get time to correct > all link we can and inform webmaster of other website. It's an unrelated issue and it's trivial to leave correct redirections on the old domain (although some projects don't do this).
pgps0LVwzLQDu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabolagnulinux.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
