El 31/10/2012 01:29, Michał Masłowski escribió:
I think the REVENUE SHARING idea is fine if:
1) We make clear to DDG they have to continue to meet our privacy &
freedom goals
This includes making their JavaScript free so we would recommend their
main search site, not the Lite one?
I agree on that, publishing the Javascript source code as free software
wouldn't affect DDG at all.
That have to be introduced into the arregment.
--
Jorge Araya Navarro
Universitario, idealista y activista del Software Libre.
Siquirres, Limón, Costa Rica.
http://swt.encyclomundi.net
Diaspora*: http://diasp.org/u/shackra
identi.ca: http://parlementum.net/sweet
Jabber: [email protected]
Skype: ¡De ninguna manera, tras de privativo, te espían!.
El software privativo en GNU/Linux, al igual que en Windows o en MacOs,
te hace un ser no-libre. Deja de engañarte, ¡¡despierta ahora!!:
http://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.html
http://replicant.us/about/
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.parabolagnulinux.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
