Sorin-Mihai Vârgolici <[email protected]> writes: > On 09.05.2013 00:17, [email protected] wrote: >> Issue #321 has been updated by csolisr. >> >> >> If you want a distro that doesn't complain about your decisions, >> switch to Arch. I won't write down the procedure as it violates the >> rules of this site, but it's possible to do it in-place. Now, what >> really bothers me is that VirtualBox doesn't actively detect whether >> the user is trying to run a non-free distro and preemptively close >> the session when detected. > > I understand the need to not give the users any posibility to use > non-free software by mistake, but I agree with hellekin. I choose what > to install and use, since freedom 0 is guaranteed to me by free > software. When I need/want to hack, reverse engineer, test, observe, > learn, understand why those abominations (called non-free and > proprietary software) exist and what they are trying to force to the > users throat, you name it, I don't need/want to be stripped of my > freedom 0 by free software. > > Or maybe someone wants to decide in my place what should I do with my > computer, regardless of my freedom 0? > Freedom in obscurity is as bad as security by obscurity!
i agree with smv, i proppose to change the color to something less violent, yellow perhaps?
pgpa3NUy8MMkL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabolagnulinux.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
