On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 10:26:54AM +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 09:41:07PM +0300, Roman Kagan wrote: > > Not so long ago openstack-nova started to require qemu-kvm-rhev instead > > of qemu-kvm. > > > > This made it impossible to install on Virtuozzo, which used to work well > > before the change. > > I think Virtuozzo is based on CentOS.
Right, to a large extent. However, our QEMU package is much closer to qemu-kvm-rhev than to CentOS' qemu-kvm. It's still different from qemu-kvm-rhev in some respects so we don't feel comfortable providing "qemu-kvm-rhev" in our package. > > I skimmed through the related tickets > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367696 > > https://review.rdoproject.org/r/1900 > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392820 > > https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9858 > > > > but failed to understand the motivation behind this change. What are > > those particular features that are only present in qemu-kvm-rhev and > > make the vendor-neutral requirement insufficient? So far we didn't > > notice any issues running recent enough QEMU with Nova, but I guess this > > must have changed. > > Dan has already responded. In short, 'qemu-kvm-rhev' is the recommended > RPM for Red Hat OSP. This is clear :) I'm interested in a longer reply to "why", in order to figure out how to correctly run Nova on top of Virtuozzo. Thanks, Roman. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@lists.rdoproject.org http://lists.rdoproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev To unsubscribe: dev-unsubscr...@lists.rdoproject.org