David Charbonnier wrote: > Thomas Bruederli a écrit : >> > but it does a lot of things that are probably not necessary. > true >> I'd prefer a generic function like >> get_form_input($name) which does something like the solution posted by >> dc.ml[at]oxys.net but with also with GET parameters: >> $in = !empty($_POST[$name]) ? $_POST[$name] : $_GET[$name]; >> > I don't like the idea to don't know from which method are data. I don't > use $_REQUEST and your solution is $_REQUEST equivalent. > > If you prefer, we can do get_input($name,$method='A') > 'A' is for All with EGPCS order, and the equivalent of your code should > be 'PG'
Agree. This would be a good solution. > > PS : Who are official devellopers with write access to cvs ? Patch to > improve RFC2822 compliance on reply messages have not been applied. Who > can I ask ? > All developers listed here: http://sourceforge.net/project/memberlist.php?group_id=139281 I have very little time at the moment and I'm not able to add patches daily. But this does not mean, that they will not be added. Also I'm willing to add more people as developers in order to have patches added to the repository. Just send me your Sourceforge user name if you're interested. Regards, Thomas
