Agreed on not making it complicated. If on login the user's workstation TZ was 
checked against the TZ stored in the db there'd be no need for a 'Use daylight 
saving' checkbox :)

Doug

On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 20:00:25 -0500, "Steven Ziling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lets not make things too complicated.
> IMHO, 2 options in Personal Settings would be enough: a TZ selection
> and a Use day light saving check box
> 
> Hows that sound like? :)
> 
> 
> 
> On 3/6/06, Doug Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thinking about it a bit, the punbb approach makes sense not only for DST
> change, but for users who travel and access webmail from different
> timezones. If the TZ is checked/updated from the local machine at login
> they always see local time on messages.... Maybe an option "Update
> timezone at login" (?)
>>
>> Doug
>>
>> On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 16:17:57 -0500, Doug Robbins
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > The issue then of course is that a user may be in a different timezone
> than
>> > the server -- a timezone that does not use DST. Or vice versa :)
>> >
>> > Perhaps RoundCube could implement something to get the TZ from the
> local
>> > user's computer and adjust the db profile accordingly. This is worth a
>> > quick read for the JS: http://forums.punbb.org/viewtopic.php?id=9711
>> >
>> > Doug
>> >
>> > On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 22:57:34 +0200, Adrian Vasile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> >> Why not select the servers TZ. The server already supports daylight
>> > savings
>> >> time.
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 06:21:49 -0500, "Steven Ziling"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> Thanks
>> >>> It would be great if RC supports day light saving time
>> >>>
>> >>> On 3/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> >>>> Here's an additional timezone for program/steps/settings/func.inc
>> >>>>
>> >>>> $select_timezone->add('(GMT -3:30) Nfld Time (Canada), Nfld, S.
>> >>> Labador', '-3.5');
>> >>>>
>> >>>> rf.
>> >>>
> http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/na/nst.html
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> Doug
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 



Reply via email to