On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 00:05:19 +0200, "B. Johannessen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt Kaatman wrote: >> This list suffers from the "reply" problem you mentioned. :) > > No it doesn't! This list suffers from having some subscribers that > didn't bother to read the list welcome message! > > Instructions for enabling Reply-To: munging are available at > http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/ > > Chip Rosenthals essay "Reply-To Munging Considered Harmful" which > explains why Reply-To: munging are disable by default on the RC lists > are available at http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > > Bob (list-mom for a few more days)
Re; http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html Some points are valid, but the whole "Some administrators claim that Reply-To munging makes it easier for users to respond to the entire list, and helps encourage list traffic. These benefits are fallacious. Moreover, Reply-To can have harmful -- even dangerous -- effects." line, makes it sound like he's mad for that feature biting him on the arse. On that note, I agree with most of the notes, and sorry for not reading, but I only fetched the addresses and did not throughfully read the welcome email. However, this topic is for another discussion which I will - hopefully - not start :) -- Elisamuel Resto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Source Mage GNU/Linux / http://sourcemage.org ID: 0x18615F19 / FP: B66D 1C2A E8EE B922 1D9C D98F D2D5 FB61 1861 5F19
