I'd second the SQLite support, even though personally I won't use it since I do have a MySQL or PG instance available. RC doesn't seem too DB heavy, and I can see many people reluctant to install a heavy DB server just for the needs of RC. I should poke around at the SQL queries RC uses, but I would assume they are simple enough where a DB abstraction layer can be used to support any DB backend easily..
-will On 9/5/07, till <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Charles, > > On 9/5/07, chasd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I know that most users will choose MySQL. > > I personally prefer PostgreSQL. > > Is there any info about users that choose the SQLite backend ? > > Anyone on the devel list use it, or test with it ? > > > are you using RoundCube with Postgres? If so, I'd really welcome your > feedback (bug reports, patches, ...). I sure hope there is not much to > report, but I guess when you use the "mdb2" backend it should work > already. > > Sqlite - I am not sure how to really support that yet. Apparently > there is a very old Sqlite2 still used and a "newer" Sqlite3. It would > be interesting to know usage stats of Sqlite (along with version) in > general so we could build stronger support. For example, I've heard > from users that their Sqlite did not support "ALTER TABLE-like" > commands, but that has been released maybe two years ago? So I am a > bit unsure what we really need to support, etc.. > > Cheers, > Till > _______________________________________________ > List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/ > _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
