* till <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [2008-02-22 12:38 +0100]:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Emanuele Rocca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, two options: reverting that patch or stating in main.inc.php that
> > 'filter' should be without surrounding brackets; the current comment is:
> > // &'d with search queries. ex: (status=act).
> >
> > I'd be for the latter.
> so where do we stand on this? I'd be for "fixing" the comments. In
> general, I'd like to support the syntax most people are familiar wit
> and use. So I have no idea about general LDAP usage. But please let us
> know so we can fix that before we release the next version.
The current code in rcube_ldap.inc is perfectly OK, and I see that
the comment has been fixed by thomasb in r1129.
Maybe you could also add an &'d example?
example: &(status=act)(visible=true)
That would clarify the proper usage even further, in my opinion.
Thanks guys.
ciao,
ema
_______________________________________________
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
