On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:56:25 +0200, "A.L.E.C" <[email protected]> wrote: > In IMAP's RFC (6.3.1 SELECT Command) is described a one element of > SELECT command response: > > OK [UNSEEN <n>] > The message sequence number of the first unseen > message in the mailbox. If this is missing, the > client can not make any assumptions about the first > unseen message in the mailbox, and needs to issue a > SEARCH command if it wants to find it. > > So, I'm just thinking loud. Can we assume that there are no unseen > messages in the mailbox when server doesn't include UNSEEN in the > response? This is true for dovecot, how about others? We could skip one > SEARCH call.
Directly contradicting the RFC? ;) What about STATUS ... (UNSEEN)? -Albert _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
