A.L.E.C wrote: > [...] > > 3. REPLY: Now we're lacking something here and current behaviour is not > 100% consistent. So, what we can do? Use htmleditor setting no matter > what is format of replied message? No. Here's my proposal. We could > extend htmleditor option to 3-option switch: > - 'never', (0) > - 'only on reply to HTML message', (2) > - 'always' (1). > I think this is self explanatory. When 0, we'll always disable HTML > editor, when 1 we'll always enable HTML editor, when 2 we'll enable HTML > editor only when replied message is in HTML format. > > Here I see one backward incompatible change. Currently when > htmleditor=true and we're reply to plain text message, the editor will > be disabled.
This sounds reasonable and I don't worry about this little incompatibility. People can easily change it in their prefs. Also true wour be 1 and therefore it's more like a fix because one might expect to write HTML replies already now. > > 4. FORWARD: Here I'm not sure, but I think editor should be set like for > NEW/EDIT mode. When we implement "forward-as-attachment" we should set > editor like for NEW message. Agree. Forward mails according to user settings and with forward-as-attachment we'd have the message forwarded without any loss. > > ps. in future we could add some per-contact format setting (like in > Thunderbird). > Not a killer-feature for me. I usually don't care what my contacts prefer but just write plaintext e-mails. ~Thomas _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/ BT/8f4f07cd
