Yes it is different now than before. But before the reply-to has been "*
wrong"* the whole time ;-)

Before: Reply to the mail has put the real sender of the e-mail into the
reply-to field
Now: Reply to the mail puts the mailing list into the reply-to field

Roundcube was actually the only list (and I'm subscribed to many OSS-lists)
where this reply-to behaviour occured.

I think how it is now is the standard for mailing lists and it prevents the
problem that you hit reply and you send an e-mail only to the real sender
of the previous mail instead of to the mailing list.


On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 8:35 AM, A.L.E.C <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 07.03.2012 02:06, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote:
> > Please, it should not be greyed out. Reply-all is commonly used for
> > mailing list communications since time immemorial.
>
> There's indeed something wrong (or just different) in Roundcube or
> mailing list settings now. I know there are some possibilities of
> settings and you can find different settings on different lists in the
> net. However, using Roundcube I can't send a reply directly to you by
> replying to your message. Reply, Reply-All, Reply-List, none puts your
> private address in recipient field(s).
>
> In Thunderbird Reply-All puts your address in CC field.
>
> --
> Aleksander 'A.L.E.C' Machniak
> LAN Management System Developer [http://lms.org.pl]
> Roundcube Webmail Developer  [http://roundcube.net]
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PGP: 19359DC1 @@ GG: 2275252 @@ WWW: http://alec.pl
> _______________________________________________
> Roundcube Development discussion mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
_______________________________________________
Roundcube Development discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to