Am 15.11.2012 21:23, schrieb Cor Bosman: > On Nov 15, 2012, at 8:31 PM, "A.L.E.C" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 11/15/2012 12:48 AM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >>> Therefore I herewith apply for that both skins share the same core >>> functionality. This is currently not the case, as I had to learn yesterday >>> (using the addressbook during composing). >> >> For me there's no reason for using contact widget in compose screen. >> It's useless. > > I really dont think you can make such bold statements. I made the > compose_addressbook plugin not because I like writing and maintaining > plugins, but because i got tons of questions and complaints from actual > users about how to add contacts from their addressbook in the compose > screen. It was just not obvious that starting to type something would > actually search in your addressbook. If you have 100,000 customers, if > only 10% ask you this, is starts to become _really_ annoying. > > Maybe some of them would have been fine with just typing, but it turns > out a lot of people dont really want that. They want to see what they > have. Maybe they cant quite remember the person they're looking for, maybe > they type really slow, maybe they're elderly and dont remember how things
> A visible, clickable, item on the screen helps. Having a > clickable addressbook in your mail client is pretty much a standard item, > for a reason. I totally agree! > Having said that, i dont think you should backport it to classic. I dont > agree with Michael that classic should remain to be supported. Well, it has been said: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Am 07.08.2012 22:26, schrieb Thomas Bruederli: > We're proud to finally announce the release of version 0.8 with the > brand new skin, codename "Larry", becoming the new default UI for > Roundcube. After two preview releases and a lot of fine-tuning, the > new design by http://bueroflint.com has now grown up. But to all the > nostalgics out there: don't worry! The old skin still remains part of > the package and will be maintained for at least one more major > release. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "At least"! And if it will be maintained, that can only mean to me "maintained". Just being (still) existent without having the same functionality, is different to being "maintained". > And besides that, my plugin functionally works fine > for classic so why put time in that at all? Well, it doesn't, as you should be aware. At least not with 0.9-git. Did you forget what we are still discussing at length (dead buttons and the like)? > It's good to hear you guys might be looking at adjusting the vertical and > horizontal spacing of the larry theme. Yeah, bit I must have missed any word about vertical spacing. Where did you read that...? Regards, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany _______________________________________________ Roundcube Development discussion mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev
