Am 02.02.2013 13:10, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 02/02/2013 12:34 AM, Michael Heydekamp wrote:
>> Unlike to Cc and Bcc, where I can manually add any other addresses while >> the ones entered in the identity are being preserved, any address added to >> the Reply-To field is not really "additional": It does overwrite the ones >> defined in the identity. > > Indeed, open a ticket. Sure, will do later on. (Did really nobody notice that before...?) > The other part of your message is already requested in > http://trac.roundcube.net/ticket/1486200. Yes, for 3 years already. And much to my surprise, it's not even considered as a bug. But indeed it IS a bug: In the meantime I also encountered that upon saving the message as a draft and continue composing it later on, the following happens: - The BCC addresses being entered in the identity are still NOT shown in the respective address field within Roundcube. BUT: - The Reply-To addresses being entered in the identity ARE all of a sudden shown in the respective address field within Roundcube. This different treatment of "Bcc" and "Reply-To" entries in identities can not be meant as being "by design". If so, the design is wrong, IMO. But this different treatment can at least be used as a workaround: Save the message as draft, close it, edit it again, and THEN you can really add a Reply-To address (by preserving the ones being entered in the identity). A bit strange, or not...? Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany _______________________________________________ Roundcube Development discussion mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev
