Hi, > > There should be no reason to keep a stale cache entry around, as was > > claimed in the comment. > > I'm not sure why the comment referred to "down" interfaces in the > RMT_DELLINK handler, perhaps older kernel versions behaved differently? > Martin, could you provide some insight into this?
I don't know if older kernels behaved differently, but at least my 3.0 kernel indicates ifup/ifdown events both with RTM_NEWLINK. So the pushed patch should work fine even if the address of a down interface changes. Regards Martin _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
