I'll give it a shot at latest Monday. Thanks! -- Paul
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Martin Willi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > > [...] which I tracked down to the tsi of the Cisco peer not returning a > > port number in its reply. > > I see. > > > Using the patch below, I was able to accommodate this omission. Does > > this seem like a reasonable change, perhaps behind a configuration > > flag? > > Thanks for the patch, looks reasonable. I don't think a configuration > option is necessary, as long as we install the more restrictive > selector. > > Instead of just checking the port, I think we can handle this in a more > generic way by selecting the subset of the proposed and the returned > selector. This should work in any case, in is actually even simpler. > Please try the attached patch, if that works, I can push it to master. > > Best regards > Martin >
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
