On 2014年01月08日 06:52, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 07-01-2014 10:48, Fan Du wrote:
>
>> Otherwise 64bits kernel has sizeof(struct xfrm_userpolicy_info) 168 bytes,
>> while 32bits compiled iproute2 see the same structure as 164 bytes, which
>> leading deficit xfrm policy, in turn broken IPsec connectivity.
>
>> Fix this by packing the structure.
>
>     This will force byte-by-byte access to all members on some arches like 
> ARM...
>
>> Signed-off-by: Fan Du <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>   include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h |    2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h b/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h
>> index a8cd6a4..470bfae 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h
>> @@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ struct xfrm_userpolicy_info {
>>       /* Automatically expand selector to include matching ICMP payloads. */
>>   #define XFRM_POLICY_ICMP    2
>>       __u8                share;
>> -};
>> +} __attribute__((packed));
>
>     Please use the __packed macro instead. I guess you haven't run 
> checkpatch.pl?

Lucky me, I run checkpatch every time before sending patch out.

-- 
浮沉随浪只记今朝笑

--fan

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to