Hi Tobias, Do you intend to merge the roam-ignore branch?
As far as I am concerned, I would be very interested in these patches. Regards, Christophe 2016-11-15 17:52 GMT+01:00 Christophe Gouault <[email protected]>: > Hi Tobias, > > I tested the first part (disable roaming if mobike is disabled and > left is one of my addresses). It fixes the problems I observed. > > I have not tested the explicit "roaming" option yet, because my > configuration uses ipsec.conf, not swanctl.conf. > > Again, thanks. > Christophe > > > > 2016-11-15 16:52 GMT+01:00 Christophe Gouault <[email protected]>: >> Hi Tobias, >> >> Thank you very much. >> I'll do a few tests with this branch. >> >> Regards, >> Christophe >> >> 2016-11-15 16:37 GMT+01:00 Tobias Brunner <[email protected]>: >>> Hi Christophe, >>> >>>> If the left address is specified and mobike is disabled for a >>>> connection, this reauth will anyway not entail a change of the source >>>> address. Would it makes sense to add an exception for such case? >>> >>> I guess we could. I've pushed a commit to the roam-ignore branch. Not >>> sure if this has any unwanted side-effects. >>> >>>> I don't use mobike for this connection, but I may enable it on other >>>> connections. I guess we cannot ignore routing events on a >>>> per-connection basis, can we? >>> >>> Currently not. But I suppose a connection specific option to disable >>> handling roam events could be added. I've pushed a prototype to the >>> aforementioned branch. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Tobias _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
