Hi Matt, > Wondering what direction I should take with this patch, I'm making > this update for a distro's (Buildroot) version of Strongswan and would > like to merge this upstream if possible. If not, I can document why > and we'll carry the patch.
libvici is mostly intended for internal use since the davici library [1] was created, due to all the advantages it provides (less restrictive license, independent of any strongSwan libraries, asynchronous API). I'd say --with-dev-headers shouldn't be used in general at all, in particular not for distro packages, because we don't provide a stable API for our libraries. Regards, Tobias [1] https://github.com/strongswan/davici
