It was <2013-10-04 pią 17:32>, when Rusty Lynch wrote: > On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 09:47 +0200, Łukasz Stelmach wrote: >> It was <2013-10-02 śro 18:06>, when Bryan, Shane wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Rusty Lynch <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 09:51 +0200, Łukasz Stelmach wrote: >>>>> It was <2013-10-01 wto 17:36>, when Rusty Lynch wrote: >>>>>> Since we have multiple platforms with multiple verticals, I like to add >>>>>> a comment that explains what I verified on (like for example 'verified >>>>>> on the XYZ image run on ABC device'). >>>>> >>>>> http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/issues/detail?id=2158 >>>>> >>>>> Let's see what happens. >>>> >>>> /me crosses fingers >>> >>> As pointed out in the first comment[1] to the issue, our gerrit >>> instance could have new, custom, labels created[2] as needed to >>> possibly achieve the desired result here. >>> >>> So, following the example you (Łukasz) provided in the issue you >>> opened, we could have the following in the project.config: >>> [...] >>> Of course, the problem becomes one of determining which repos require >>> which targets be verified... as not all are intended for all targets, >>> be that by ARCH or by Vertical (IVI, Mobile, TV, etc...). >> >> AFAIK this is what profiles are all about. Packages in profile/ivi/* >> repos are for IVI and profile/mobile/* ones are for mobiles. The rest >> should work on both. >> >>> So this would add either additional administration effort, or a >>> mapping between repos and build/vertical targets. Who knows, maybe we >>> already have that? >> >> Don't the Tizen:Mobile and Tizne:IVI OBS projects hold that information? > > Sure... verification profile specific packages only needs to be done for > that specific profile, although you still have multiple platforms in a > given platform. > > The reality is (at least for IVI) that we only use a handful of packages > from profile/ivi for tizen 3.0 work. The vast majority of all the > packages used in the system are shared with all other verticals. What > we need is a mechanism in gerrit to specify exactly how the verification > was done (like on an Intel Baytrail IVI platform or XYZ ARM IVI platform > or ...).
I think a radio button group per (selected) OBS project should be enough. Not every project of course. For example Tize:Mobiel and Tizen:Mobile:build look like they can use a single group. -- Łukasz Stelmach Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics
pgpjGKts6rJlz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
