Title: Samsung Enterprise Portal mySingle

> The easy and, to my mind correct, solution is to let the
> kernel take care of setting the security attributes and
> throw out the whole "launcher" thing. I have *never*
> been presented evidence that launchers actually
> improve performance in the final deployed configuration.
> But, that's a separate argument.

Yes, it is a separete argument but I will just suggest the brief number.

On the TIZEN 2.1 (previous version) mobile profile, it gives the huge difference. My test app shows:

- launch without preloading : 950msec

- launch with proper preloading : 630msec

When my colleague analized the performance bottle neck, he found that around 100~200msec is consumed on the dynamic loader. I know there are several solutions like prelink or readlink but preloading works better. For WebApp, wrt_launchpad performs pre-initialization heavily and it has much more number than Core/Osp App in terms of performance gain.

 

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to