On 17.10.2013 12:31, Patrick Ohly wrote:
For example, exclusive write access to the sqlite DB in EDS or the Tizen
contacts service simplifies change notification, because a single
process knows what changes are made at a semantic level and can send
change notifications to readers more efficiently. With shared write
access, all a reader can get from the OS is "file modified".

You can have an auxiliary notification queue with sqlite or you could use postgresql and it's NOTIFY/LISTEN.

There's also nothing that prevents multithreading in such a design. I
don't see how you came to that conclusion. EDS is internally
multithreaded and allows concurrent reads directly from the sqlite file
(only writing is centralized).

There's a write bottleneck, because with record-locking you could simultaneously write to different portions of file without conflicts. But unfortunately sqlite doesn't support that, so it needs some more advanced database.

When you expand this, or read/write locking (for multi-reader, single-writer) outside of the process you already solved the problem.

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to