>> Here, at Samsung, we are experimenting with product specific DBus >> extension to use kdbus (kernel module) as a transport layer instead of Unix >> sockets. >> Currently the scope is limited to enable applications using either libdbus or >> glib (libgio) to work on top of kdbus bus without noticing any difference. >> More one can find in a brief arch description attached to modified dbus >> sources (see doc-kdbus directory). In the same place there is also a current >> development status. We will add there also our todo list. > >What is your plan regarding supporting Smack? If you do not support Smack controls in kdbus it can not be used in Tizen. >Really. That's a day one requirement.
I agree with you. We've been studying about it. We plan to use standard LSM in kdbus. However, as you know, we have to implement more things to support Smack controls in kdbus. Please give us more times to clarify our ideas about it. Best Regards, Hyungjun. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
