> On 11/04/2013 08:49 PM, Jussi Laako wrote: > > On 31.10.2013 19:44, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: > >> Converting libdbus seems like a dead end - at a certain point libdbus > >> should be obsolete and glib internally should be using libsystemd-bus. > > > > libdbus is obsolete already as glib has it's own implementation...
That's why kdbus transport layer for glib (sometimes mentioned "gdbus") is also being developed as well. > > obsolete or not, a lot of things depend on libdbus already and porting > it helps those that rely on it but allowing them to not do any work. at > least for now. Agree. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev > > _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
