On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 12:04 -0800, Gerken, Stephen wrote: > Reading Tizen 3 source has already yielded the following list of > objects exposed in the Javascript namespace: > [...] > tizen.contact > tizen.Contact > tizen.ContactGroup > tizen.ContactRef > tizen.ContactName > tizen.ContactOrganization > tizen.ContactWebsite > tizen.ContactAnniversary > tizen.ContactAccress > tizen.ContactPhoneNumber > tizen.ContactEmailAddress [...]
That's consistent with the API specification and examples. > I am struck by the Contact objects all appearing as second-level under > tizen, as opposed to being grouped under tizen.contact; I wonder why > they are different. That's a good question. I wasn't involved in the definition of the API, so I don't know the answer either. If I had to guess, I would say it wasn't intentional and just happened to be done differently by the people defining the contacts part, perhaps to save JS developers some typing. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
