On 12/02/2013 12:53 AM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 22:57 -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote: >> On quinta-feira, 28 de novembro de 2013 14:53:43, Gaurav Kalra wrote: >>> I also think https://source.tizen.org/documentation/ should be >>> discarded (agreeable ?) >>> >>> Content already present in /documentation can be shifted to the wiki >>> portal and only 1 place is maintained for the documentation. >> >> Let's concentrate on the wiki for now. Whatever portions of the wiki become >> static and reflect long-term project goals will be moved back to >> source.tizen.org. But I'll do that with the web team at a later date. > > +1. I myself maintain a piece of doc at 'source.tizen.org', and changing > it is a lot more difficult operation than changing a wiki page.
Personally I think doing on the wiki is great, as long as care is taken not to let too much stale content gather, which is wiki's usual downfall. But I assume there was a good reason to put in place the author-reviewers-editor-publish workflow on the website in the first place, is "someone" going to get upset if that flow is not used for content which becomes public? _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
