On 01/27/2014 09:50 AM, Dominig ar Foll (Intel OTC) wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I see in that some of us would like to integrate very early features in
> Tizen Kernel while some other would prefer to remain conservative.
> In order to agree on a common model, I would like to propose the
> following simple concepts.

Should external/out-of-tree kernel modules be somehow addressed in
such proposal too?


>  - Only patches accepted in a published 'release' Linux Kernel can be
> used in Tizen Base/Common
>  - Kernel source should be common for all verticals, but Kernel config
> is vertical specific.

Ɓukasz Stelmach proposed this already, please see Artem's response

  https://lists.tizen.org/pipermail/dev/2013-December/001335.html


>  - Tizen Generic (which is only a development tool) will follow that rule.
>  - Back-ported patches accepted in a more recent 'release' of the kernel
> are acceptable in Tizen Base/Common
>  - Vertical may decide to use non "released" patches but that is not
> advisable.
>  - Platform integrator remain free of their implementation as long as it
> complies with their vertical requirements.
> 
> That model should allow us to remain agile, while protecting us to
> introduce fork from the kernel main line and to create a maintenance
> nightmare.

Cheers,
Karol
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to