But the services realted to BTRFS don't need to run in the background on
images built with EXT4 since they are useless, yet they run as the root
user. The snapper daemon is not needed and we could at least turn it off on
the images built, one less root process.
Also i'd think using btrfs might be a great idea in terms of usability,
snapshots are a great way for backups and safety in case of software updates
etc. They are fast and don't take any more disk space then the changes they
hold. OpenSUSE is using that as default now and i know Facebook is doing a
major implementation on BTRFS, it supports security labels so SMACK should
work just fine.
On 04/02/2014 08:48 PM, Dominig ar Foll (Intel OTC) wrote:
Le 02/04/2014 20:27, Kok, Auke-jan H a écrit :
Every device manufacturer may choose a different FS as well. Tizen
currently has no hard requirements for any features that require btrfs
or other FSs.
The selected file system need to support Smack security extension.
Smack uses the extended file attributes which are supported by most
Linux FS.
But for example FAT does not.
(even if FAT support will certainly be required for removable media such
as SD or UBS card what is an other issue that will need to solve).
Dominig
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
--
--------------
Roman Kubiak
--------------
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
