On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 16:09 +0200, José Bollo wrote: > On mar, 2014-05-13 at 15:59 +0200, Rafał Krypa wrote: > > On 2014-05-13 14:29, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > > On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 11:13 +0000, Counihan, Tom wrote: > > > > I will end up with a total count of 1 browser process and 4 other > > > > processes (2x extension & renderer) = 5 processes? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this correct? > > > And to extend the question, which process will be the one talking to the > > > rest of the system services?
[...] > I agree with you. There is a problem. Is was thinking that the W3C API > was handled at the renderer process level. Having it common to all apps > is a problem for the reasons you written. Note that my question about "which process talks to services" (or, in a similar vain, accesses files) has not been answered yet. It might still be the per-app render process which does it. Before we cry wolf, it would be good to get explicit confirmation of the facts by people who have first-hand experience with Crosswalk. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
