On 5/13/14, 10:51 AM, "Dominig ar Foll (Intel OTC)" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hello, > >I have been receiving two links about security weaknesses in the first >Tizen device launched on the market, the Samsung nx3000 camera that I >want to share with you. >If you have a quick look at the reports posted on the following URLs you >will see that it could be better. >I know that it's 'only' a Camera and a very first Tizen based product, >nevertheless I doubt that we want a Tizen car or a phone to be "that" >open. > >In short, I hope that this very informative reading will help all if us >(including me) who regularly curse our Tizen security constrains and the >extra work that they force on us, to think twice at why we want/need to >enforce a Mandatory Access Control (Smack) and Application Manifest >enforcement in Tizen3, even if that give a bit more work. > >Taking the short cut will not be easier. > >Enjoy the reading. > > http://op-co.de/blog/posts/hacking_the_nx300/ > https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7711200 Thank you Dominique for posting this. It definitely shows that people will not miss finding issues in Tizen devices. Ryan _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
