On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 15:49 +0200, Dominig ar Foll (Intel OTC) wrote: > > > > > 2014-05-13 15:05 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Wojciechowski > > <[email protected]>: > > So if I understand it correctly for given diagram: > > > > https://docs.google.com/a/open.eurogiciel.org/drawings/d/1046sK8s0i7jDI0EwKoDckR8l_kLIS9QbE0l-Crks9yg/edit > > > > there are: > > * for User 1: > > ** 1 browser process > > ** 3x2 application processes (3 renderer and 3 extension > > processes) > > * for User 2: > > ** 1 browser process > > ** 2x2 application processes (2 renderer and 2 extension > > processes) > > > > Total 12 processes. > > > > Do I understand that properly ? > > > > > Better than in Tizen 2 where the full WRT/EFL was re-spawned for each > application :-)
And worse than in Tizen 2 because the WRT now has to be trusted and cannot rely on the system to enforce privileges, right? There's no free lunch. This is just a different tradeoff between performance and security, and so far we don't seem to have security covered yet for web apps. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
