Hi Patrick,
-qa-unsafe-* images are equivalent to their counterpart (without -qa-unsafe)
with a few extra tools & setup to allow automated QA tests:
- some needed packages to run QA scripts: testkit-lite, screen, which (see
pattern "Common Automated QA" in profile/common/meta)
- a ssh setup for root that allows a non-interactive login with a specific key
(see profile/common/meta/scripts/common-autoqa.post)
The image is tagged 'qa' because of the 3 extra tools we don't want to have in
the usual release.
And it's tagged 'unsafe' because anyone can log as root without entering a
password, if the appropriate key (which is known) is copied on ssh client side.
So there's no functional difference between the two images: being as close as
possible is even a requirement, as we don't want to run QA tests on -qa-unsafe
images that would give different results on the 'official' image.
Feel free to pick the one you prefer. For daily usage, the -qa-unsafe image is
handy, even if no QA is done on it.
Best regards,
--
Stéphane Desneux
Intel OTC - Vannes/FR
gpg:1CA35726/DFA9B0232EF80493AF2891FA24E3A2841CA35726
Patrick Ohly wrote:
On Sat, 2014-05-17 at 15:17 +0200, Stéphane Desneux wrote:
Dear all,
I'm glad to announce the first daily releases for Tizen:Common,
Please find attached the reports for ia32 and x86_64 releases of yesterday (yes,
I'm a bit late :-)).
The whole process for releasing Tizen:Common regularly is currently setting up
and we plan to post here for the weekly releases only. We're actually studying
where to post the daily reports.
Anyway, the daily and weekly releases will be available here:
http://download.tizen.org/releases/daily/tizen/common/
http://download.tizen.org/releases/weekly/tizen/common/
Feedback is highly appreciated.
You are currently producing two kinds of images,
common-qa-unsafe-wayland-mbr and common-wayland-mbr, both for i386 and
x86-64. What is the difference?
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
