Hi: > We need to have a clear recommendation on what APIs people should use. Going > through the thread, it appears that one would be missing out on some key > multi-user and security check and enforcement points if by-passing NTB and > going straight to BlueZ, ConnMan, oFono, etc. as you suggest. If true, we > shouldn't advise people to do it. Even leaving the multi-user and security > aspects aside for a minute, I'd be concerned by having two distinct entities > trying to manage the same set of services independently. There are some > operations that fail today is you use 'connmanctl' while 'net-config' is > running. > > Will you provide a utility (similar to what 'connmanctl' provides for > ConnMan) that users and developers can leverage when no UI is available? You can download the code, and have a look at the test directory. And at developing mode, it can run at PC(Ubuntu). So as the security check, I think NTB does not handle that. It should be handled above of CAPI at Tizen service daemon? > > > > > So as to NAP(Tethering), it is exported from ConnMan, and Tizen use > > Mobile- AP-Agent to wrap the ConnMan interface, and we are working on > > WiNet project to optimize it. currently, you can just use > > Mobile-AP-Agent. I think that part IVI can share Tizen Mobile work. > Same question as above regarding a command-line utility but for WiNet, will > you provide one? We will have the same test code there.
> > Thanks, > Geoffroy _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
